Syllabus | Schedule and Assignments |
Text: Game Theory, manuscript by Thomas Ferguson, UCLA.
Course Webpage: http://math.holycross.edu/~anderson/math125.html
Contact: My office is Swords 340, phone 793-2459, email: anderson@mathcs.holycross.edu
Office Hours: Monday 11 - 12, Tuesday 11- 12, 2 - 3, Friday 9 - 10 or by appointment.
Problem Sets: Weekly problem sets. Problems and due dates are posted on the course webpage. Problems marked with a * are bonus problems. Late problem sets are not accepted, except in the case of documented illness. Working together on problem sets is OK, copying someone else's homework is not.
In-Class Presentation: Everyone must contribute one in-class presentation (15 - 20 minutes) on a topic from the text. These will be assigned (on a volunteer basis) on the fly; you will generally have two ot three class periods advance notice.
Exams: One take-home midterm exam, distributed Friday, March 5; due Friday March 19; and one take-home final, distributed May 3, due May 15.
Final Projects: A substantial team project, with both presentation and written components. Teams will consist of three people. Each team will give a fifty-minute presentation during the last two weeks (April 23 - May 3), and prepare a companion written report (15 - 20 pages). Each team will contribute two problems for a take-home final based on the projects.
Project Timetable:
- Monday, January 26 - Project List Posted
- Monday, February 2 - Teams and Choice of Projects due (5 pts)
- February 9 - February 13 - Initial Project Consultations (5 pts.)
- March 1 - March 5 - Second Project Consultation (5 pts.)
- March 22 - April 2 - Third Project Consultation (5 pts.)
- April 13 - 16 - Last Project Consultation, Outline due (10 pts.)
- April 23 - May 3 Project Presentations (60 pts.)
- May 15 - Final Project Report due (60 pts.)
Component | Total Points = 500 | Percentage |
Problem Sets (10) | 20 x 10 = 200 | 40 % |
In-Class Presentation | 25 | 5 % |
Midterm (take-home) | 75 | 15 % |
Final Project | 150 | 30 % |
Final Exam | 50 | 10 % |
Academic Honesty: This course operates under the College and Departmental policies on academic honesty.
J
|
Date | Topics |
|
Problem Sets etc. | |
W | 1 | 1/21 | Introduction to Impartial Combinatorial Games: Examples, Definition,
P and N positions. |
I-1 |
2.6 # 1, 2a, c, 3, 7a, b*
|
F | 2 | 1/23 | Games as directed graphs, algorithm for finding P and N positions, characterization (axioms). Begin discussion of Nim. | I-1, I-2, I-3 | |
M | 3 | 1/26 | Nim-Sum. Bouton's Theorem,
applications.
Project Lists Posted |
I-2 | |
W | 4 | 1/28 | Proof of Bouton's Theorem (presentation by Gabe Weaver), the Sprague-Gundy Function of a Graph, P-positions and S-G values. | I-2, I-3 |
3.5
# 1, 2, 3 (find the S-G function up to position 20 or so, and see if you
can describe the pattern), 5 (you can save yourself some work by noticing
that the values have to be symmetric - interchanging rows and columns doesn't
change the answer.
4.5 # 1, 4, 8, 9, 11a-d,e*
|
F | 5 | 1/30 | S-G value 0 <-> P position
(presentation by Heather Johnson) Sums of games, the S-G Theorem |
I-3, I-4 | |
M | 6 | 2/2 | Choice of Projects Due
Application of the S-G Theorem to Lasker's Nim, Kayles |
I-4 | |
W | 7 | 2/4 | Proof of the S-G Theorem
(presentation by Rosanna Arcuri) Introduction to Matrix Games Mixed strategies, expected values |
II-1 | #
3 - due Wednesday 2/11
(from chapter II) 1.5
# 1, 3, 4
2.6 # 2, 3, 4a, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
F | 8 | 2/6 | 2 x 2 zero-sum games, solving by equalizing
payoffs. |
II-2 | |
M | 9 | 2/9 | First Project Consultations this week
The general concept of value, domination, saddle points. |
II-2 | |
W | 10 | 2/11 | Symmetric games (A antisymmetric); V = 0 for symmetric games. Examples: rock-paper-scissors, Morra |
# 4 - due Wednesday
3/3
(from chapter II) 3.7 # 1,
2 (hint: think about saddle points), 3, 4, 9, 13b, 15
4.7 # 2 (hint: B = cA + d for some numbers c,d), 4 5.9 # 2, 3, 10bc |
|
F | 11 | 2/13 | Invariant games; using invariance to reduce
the number of strategies. Example: Colonel Blotto. |
||
M | 12 | 2/16 | General results: the Equilibrium theorem, the Principle of Indifference. | ||
W | 13 | 2/18 | Solution of games for which the matrix A is invertible. |
|
|
F | 14 | 2/20 | Solution of games for which the matrix A is invertible. | ||
M | 15 | 2/23 | Solving a game reduces to a linear programming problem: minimize x1 + ... + xn subject to Ax > 1 . | ||
W | 16 | 2/25 | Solving a linear programming problem in a simple example. Start discussion of extensive form games. | ||
F | 17 | 2/27 | Extensive form games, conversion to matrix form. | ||
M | 18 | 3/1 | Second Project Consultations this week
Algorithm for solving general games (presentation by Joe Hibdon and Kirk Kozol) |
||
W | 19 | 3/3 | Two-person general-sum games in matrix and extensive form. | ||
F | 20 | 3/5 | Safety levels and Pure Strategic equilibria.
Take-home midterm distributed. |
||
M | 3/8 | no class - spring break | |||
W | 3/10 | no class - spring break | |||
F | 3/12 | no class - spring break | |||
M | 21 | 3/15 | Strategic Equilibria. Finding PSE's and
general SE's by equalizing strategies. Comparison with safety levels. |
||
W | 22 | 3/17 | Prisoner's Dilemma |
|
|
F | 23 | 3/19 | Economic Models I
Take-home midterm due |
||
M | 24 | 3/22 | Evolutionarily Stable Strategies | ||
W | 25 | 3/24 | Economic Models II (presentations by Kevin Hyland and Dennis Langer) | #
5 - due Wednesday 3/31
(from chapter III) 2.5 # 1, 2ab, 4, 5a, 6, 7, 9 3.5 # 1a, 2 plus problem on handout about ESS |
|
F | 26 | 3/26 | Proof of Nash's Equilibrium Theorem
(presentations by Noah Shier and Rich Ghiorse) |
||
M | 27 | 3/29 | Cooperative Games - TU and NTU games.
Payoff sets for NTU games as the convex hull of payoffs. Payoff sets for TU games. |
||
W | 28 | 3/31 | Application of Nash's technique to Labor-Management bargaining problem | ||
F | 29 | 4/2 | Finding the Nash bargaining solution for NTU games, examples |
|
|
M | 30 | 4/5 | Properties of the convex hull (presentation by Jen Strazdins)
Threat points and side payments in TU games. |
||
W | 31 | 4/7 | Proof of Nash's theorem on the bargaining solution
(presentations by Michelle Greene and Matt Fanning) |
||
F | 4/9 | no class - Good Friday |
|
||
M | 4/12 | no class - Easter recess | |||
W | 32 | 4/14 | TU games - finding threat point | ||
F | 33 | 4/16 | TU Example: Game show contestants (Caitlin Agostinacchio)
N - person games, games in coalitional (characteristic function) form |
||
M | 34 | 4/19 | Carpool example of a game in characteristic function form (presentation by Josh Ruffin). Imputations and the core. | ||
W | 35 | 4/21 | Geometric representation of the core in three-person games (presentation by Emmit Ferriter). Completion of the carpool example. | ||
F | 36 | 4/23 | Matt, Kirk, Noah : Gambit | ||
M | 37 | 4/26 | Caitlin, Joe, Gabe : Surreal Numbers | ||
W | 38 | 4/28 | Rosana, Michelle, Heather: Voting Theory I | ||
F | 39 | 4/30 | Rich, Jen: Voting Theory
II
Handout |
||
M | 40 | 5/3 | Emmit, Kevin, Dennis, Josh: Auctions | ||
5/15 | Take-home final due |
Last modified: May 3, 2004