Jillian Bowdring -- Satirical Portrayal of the Flatland Women I think you are exactly right in your explanation of Abbott's satirical intentions in his portrayal of the women in Flatland. It might be hard to appreciate for students today, but the kinds of things A. Square says are not all that far from things one used to hear all the time. Look at the first seasons of the TV show "Mad Men" (set in the early 1960's) for an pretty realistic example of this. Similarly, when I was growing up I remember hearing serious discussions from "talking heads" about how women were too emotional and unstable to be trusted with the sorts of decisions a President would have to make. (This is in reference to your digression on the women candidates in the recent Presidential election!) Your writing is generally good, but I think there are times when some more detailed editing would help get your points across more effectively. For example, in your first paragraph (my comments marked with the > characters): In his novel, Flatland, Edwin A. Abbott satirizes the prejudice attitudes that were common in the Victorian Era by inventing a world where the characters are geometric shapes with relatable personalities. These ideals are disguised by using universal idea of shapes while also giving them personalities to help the reader relate. > I think you meant "prejudiced" in the first sentence. Also, the second sentence really just repeats the ideas that the geometric shapes are universal but the Flatland characters have personalities so that they relate to human characters in real life. I don't think the second sentence adds anything, so it is not necessary. Each character’s shape determines his or her status in society. The highest authorities in this society are circles and are exclusively male, while the lowest class consists of lines and they are exclusively female. > This is all good. Abbott did this to portray the inequality of social classes during the Victorian Era. Through explaining Flatland’s nature, its inhabitants, and the role and suppression of women, Abbott is able to purposefully create a satire that exposes the inequality of women during the Victorian Era. > Here again, it seems as though there is a lot of duplication between these two sentences. I think something like the second one could stand alone as the link between the opening paragraph and what follows. But even that second sentence could also be tightened up by deleting the "is able to:" "By explaining Flatland’s nature, its inhabitants, and the role and suppression of women, Abbott purposefully creates a satire that exposes the inequality of women during the Victorian Era." Content: A- Mechanics: B+