Connor, I would have to disagree (along with you) with anyone who thought that Christopher's problems fitting into society due to his difficulty interpreting emotions in others, his inclination toward mathematics and science, and his sensory integration disorder were evidence of "character flaws." To me, all of these aspects of his personality are mostly by-products of the fact that his brain just happens to work differently from most human brains. That is not evidence of a flaw in his character and it's even less a choice he made. It is a part of who he is. Now given that, it's certainly possible to find his behaviors mysterious, but I think it's still possible to try to understand them and feel empathy for him and for all people in the same situation. I'm glad to see that you have come to some of that kind of feeling toward Christopher. Crossing that border of empathy is one of the things we hoped everyone in CHQ would experience by reading this book. Your final point, namely that it is the structure of the novel that makes it possible for people who don't think like Christopher to get inside his head to some extent, is an excellent one. I don't think you quite say it this way, but to me the fact that we are hearing about what goes on in Christopher's mind from Christopher himself is what makes it possible to feel that we have come to understand him. And of course Christopher is intelligent in just the sort of ways that would allow him to analyze and describe his own mental processes in a believable way. A couple of writing comments: In your final paragraph, "Christopher as the narrator allows me ... " doesn't really work, though. You might say "The fact that Mark Haddon makes Christopher the narrator allows me ... " (you might also say "readers" more generally instead of "me"). Finally, "The success of Christopher’s future remains uncertain ... " doesn't completely work either. Maybe "Whether Christopher will be successful in the future remains uncertain ... " Content: 95 (A) Mechanics: 92 (A-)