Michaela, I can certainly understand why you say empathizing with Christopher did not come too easily. But I'm glad that you feel you have come to understand Christopher to some extent, because crossing that border of empathy is one of the things we hoped everyone would experience in reading this book. The additional example added a lot to the overall impact of what you are saying. Specific comments: (1) First paragraph: For "the areas that Christopher excels" you probably want "the areas in which Christopher excels". He's not excelling the areas -- I'm not even sure what that would mean(!) There's a parallel place in your final paragraph where I have the same comment. (2) The second paragraph is somewhat repetitive now. You say that Christopher hates new people and new places several times in very similar ways. It gets to be too much after a while. Here's one way to address that: In the first sentence, I think you could say just "... detests the train station because he hates places and people he does not know everything about." Then in your sentence after the quotation, you could refer to this idea without spelling it all out again -- something like: "Because Christopher explains to readers how he feels in these situations, readers can catch a glimpse of what it is like ... " (3) In the final paragraph: The sentence "But, after reading this novel, it is clear that although Christopher has some minor challenges with social interactions, finding his emotions, and listening,the areas that Christopher excels" seems to be missing something. Did you mean to say that "the areas in which Christopher excels partly make up for those challenges"? Or did something get pasted in here by mistake? Also, I think "minor" is probably an understatement. Think of the behavior in the clothes store you described before. That seems to present more than a "minor" challenge to Christopher's being able to fit into society. (4) The next sentence: "In conclusion, Christopher transcends the border between a mental disability and a physiologically normal person" doesn't quite make sense because "a mental disability" and "a physiologically normal person" are in two completely different categories. I also have the feeling autocomplete might have done you a disservice here -- did you mean "psychologically" instead of "physiologically"? A physiologically normal person would be one all of whose bodily functions (like digestion, muscular function, etc.) are normal. That's much more general. (5) Final sentence: I don't think you need the "a mental disability such as" Content: 92 (A-) Mechanics: 88 (B+)