Paolo Prendushi -- First Writing Assignment (catchy title :) ) In thinking about the Mark Twain quotation that was part of the prompt for this assignment, I think it's necessary to recall that Twain was first and foremost a "humorist" and a satirist -- his first goal in almost everything he said and wrote was *to make people laugh* (at others and at themselves) and then to get them to think about how silly a lot of their preconceptions and actions are. So it seems to me that his idea that aging in reverse would lead to an "infinitely happier life" is not a serious proposal. It's a way to get us to laugh about the indignities of aging. He wants us to think about whether being young is really any better than being old and whether life really would be any better "in reverse." Your essay relating this idea from the film "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" has some good points. You do a pretty good job of pointing out ways that Benjamin's story essentially shows that what Twain is saying is not true at all on the literal level. (And in fact, the Fitzgerald story on which the movie was loosely based is even more clearly a sort of "thought experiment" designed to refute Twain's literal claim.) But there is more you could say too and you only really considered how Daisy and Benjamin interact during parts of their lives. But it's good that you also clearly see that the main issue for Benjamin is not only that he is aging "in reverse." It's that he is an single individual living "in reverse" in a world of people aging in the normal direction. So he faces obstacles you discuss and many others too at almost every step of the way. Even though he has many of the same physical-age-appropriate experiences as other people, his physical appearance and condition are always out of step with his mental age *from the point of view of those other people*. So it's not just the direction of aging by itself that is the really important point. It's how that direction of aging makes you in step or out of step with everyone around you that really matters for how things play out in this story. The writing is generally good but there are some issues. I would suggest that you really think twice about using words like "transcendent" or "unique." It's easy to end up sounding "way over the top" with them unless the thing you are describing really does transcend all comparable things or if it is literally one of a kind. There are also some unclear and garbled-sounding sentences. At bottom of page 2, for instance: "He is in love with Daisy and wants to be there, but in such a complicated case as his where death isn’t even the driving force of his solidarity is what makes it that much more depressing and grim." I just don't know what you meant there. I mostly don't see how "solidarity" fits with this or how the last clause "is what makes it that much more depressing and grim" relates to the rest of the sentence. In your last paragraph, there is another sentence that I could just not figure out: "It makes a case like Benjamin’s believable, a person constantly learning from his mistakes, falling in love and yet falling in a love that no one but him can go through." What does the "it" refer to? The only things in the previous sentences that would work are the references to Benjamin or his case. But neither of those can be what you meant here. Content -- B+ Structure/Mechanics -- B