Luke, Your paper contains a lot of interesting details concerning Cardano's colorful life and a good summary of his mathematical contributions. You are overusing the "Renaissance man" angle, though (even though that idea certainly does apply to someone like Cardano). I might also quibble with your use of the word renaissance in the parallel phrase in the title. Having a "renaissance of problems" should mean that the problems start up again or come back after a period in which they are not in evidence. (The word "renaissance" literally means "rebirth" as you probably know.) It was not entirely clear that you were saying that, although the case could be made for that interpretation. Most importantly, I think your writing unfortunately gets pretty badly "overheated" at times. You get too excited about what you are trying to say and that makes it difficult to figure out what it is that you are trying to say. Sentences like: "Cardano’s other great Mathematical contribution came from his work with probability based on his use of Mathematical logic for the advancing of his gammbling that took up a large portion of his life and thoughts in his book entitled ​Liber de ludo aleae or in English, ​ The Book on Games of Chance." ​ (page 4) just sort of tumble out and ramble on without enough structure. This could be divided into three separate sentences, in fact: "Cardano's other great mathematical contribution came in his work on probability. This was based on his use of mathematical logic to advance his success in gambling, an activity that took up a large portion of his life. His thoughts on this subject formed the basis of his book "Liber de ludo aleae," or in English "The Book on Games of Chance." When you want your writing to make a good impression, after you get your ideas down in a first draft, careful revision is an absolute necessity. Grade: A-